| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
RiverDrive
Joined: 19 Aug 2004
Posts: 80
Location: Philadelphia PA. US
|
 Posted: Wed May 17, 2006 9:05 am Post subject: |
 |
|
I never thought of it that way. I see your point
_________________
01 Sport Cup
"Quality is the parent, the source of all subjects and objects." - Robert Pirsig |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
dmon722000
Joined: 28 Nov 2005
Posts: 51
Location: Ft. Lauderdale, Miami
|
| Posted: Wed May 17, 2006 9:14 am Post subject: |
|
|
| I would go with the 132.5 as a start, a 137 is huge and with no ignition or internal mods I would shy away from it like a chinese motorcycle in a clearance sale! also, upon reassembly ensure that the bellows in both carbs are functioning properly. Well have a good time... Dwight |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
cat
Joined: 30 Nov 2005
Posts: 398
Location: South Africa
|
| Posted: Wed May 17, 2006 9:42 am Post subject: |
|
|
| RiverDrive wrote: | | I never thought of it that way. I see your point |
Someone said they were 20kg, but my weight is only 60, so I was wondering. I don't think it's that much, probably more like15, or 14. I really must weigh it - someone I know must have a scale. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Blathian
Joined: 28 May 2005
Posts: 51
Location: California
|
| Posted: Fri May 19, 2006 9:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| 5.5 turns out?? isnt that thing about ready to fall out? i head 3.5 is the most you should do and im at sea lvl in california. ive been having backfire issues, since a new mechanic adjusted my carb for me...which i didnt want. SO im rejeting on monday, he said he has jets and M4 suggested changing the main jet and moving up 1 notch. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
