MZ Riders    
A Community for owners and riders of MZ Motorcycles, Scooters, and ATVs.    
 

lowering options for the baghira

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    MZ/MuZ Riders Forum Index :: 660 cc
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
alex1206



Joined: 27 Nov 2005
Posts: 12

PostPosted: Mon Mar 20, 2006 11:45 pm    Post subject: lowering options for the baghira Reply with quote

hi
after reading all these posts about how the height reduced model has better street handaling i am questions how i can lower a regular height.

i believe the main option would be to switch out the forks and the shocks and understand this can be done for roughly 300 dollars.
how many inches will it shorten by if i go with this method? parts can be easily sourced?

the second option is switching out the rear spring. from my understanding that this is okay but will interefere with designed shock travel and may interfere with handaling?

im 5'9, 155 pounds, and i hear guys at 6' and above having troubles reading the ground with both feet. i dont want to have troubles walking pulling the bike in and out.

thanks ahead of time
alex
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Garf



Joined: 06 Jul 2005
Posts: 92
Location: Manchester, UK.

PostPosted: Tue Mar 21, 2006 2:52 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

It is possibly a cheaper and ultimately better option to have your existing adjustable forks modified by a suspension tuner .....it is a common mod when running a crosser in supermoto trim. The standard MZ hieght reduced forks are not adjustable. The same option to modify may apply to the rear shock but I am not quite so sure about that.

Cheers

_________________
HR Black Panther
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
phlat65
Moderator


Joined: 13 Nov 2003
Posts: 703
Location: Seattle

PostPosted: Tue Mar 21, 2006 11:17 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

replacing the spring in the rear shock is the wrong approach.

any good suspension shop can lower it properly, by making a spacer to limit the extended travel of both the shock and fork. the nice thing about this method, you end up with a HR with adjustable forks.

also, post here, maybe someone in your area wants to do the reverse, or maybe you could sample a HR before you proceed.

of note, a full height has 280mm travel front and rear, a HR has 190mm front and rear.
also, the baghira castor angle is 130mm, and steering angle is 28mm, the Mastiff castor angle is 73mm, and steering angle is 26mm

I seem to remember hearing that the HR uses the mastiff geometry, and I cinda think so, my bike in Full height trim does handle different than the street moto I took all the suspension from. hey Dave, are the frame and tripple tree PN's the same for street moto and the Black Panther and Mastiff?

_________________
2001 MZ Black Panther
2001 Suzuki RM125 (full Enduro)
Old Hondas- TT500 Ascott, 305 Dream Touring
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
keithcross



Joined: 20 May 2004
Posts: 870
Location: Hampshire England

PostPosted: Wed Mar 22, 2006 3:09 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

The triple tree are teh same. There are different part numbers in te cat, but there are applicable to all bikes, the only difference seems to be frame colour.

Keith

_________________
Ride it like you stole it
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Yahoo Messenger
phlat65
Moderator


Joined: 13 Nov 2003
Posts: 703
Location: Seattle

PostPosted: Fri Mar 24, 2006 12:30 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

so how do they get the drasticly different geometry?
_________________
2001 MZ Black Panther
2001 Suzuki RM125 (full Enduro)
Old Hondas- TT500 Ascott, 305 Dream Touring
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
keithcross



Joined: 20 May 2004
Posts: 870
Location: Hampshire England

PostPosted: Fri Mar 24, 2006 7:50 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I think by using shorter front forks the wheelbase is shortened, also ashorter rear shock will make the bike lower as well. Cant see any other reason for the change in geomerty. Both numbers are listed for all models, difference being the colour only as far as I can tell.
Maybe others can explain it.

Keith

_________________
Ride it like you stole it
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Yahoo Messenger
fasrnu



Joined: 25 May 2006
Posts: 43
Location: Xtreme SE Tennessee,USA

PostPosted: Fri May 26, 2006 4:26 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Garf wrote:
It is possibly a cheaper and ultimately better option to have your existing adjustable forks modified by a suspension tuner .....it is a common mod when running a crosser in supermoto trim. The standard MZ hieght reduced forks are not adjustable. The same option to modify may apply to the rear shock but I am not quite so sure about that.

Cheers


I am planning to build a dogbone of a different length to lower the rear about 2 inches. I may just slide the forks up thru the trees a couple inches also. This has worked quite well for me on other bikes I have owned. A note of caution: this will make your off-roading a bit more difficult because of the suspension travel issue. I only occasionally ride off road and then only on fire trails. 90% of my riding is paved twisties.....Yeehah!!! YMMV
________
Digital Vaporizer
________
HERBALAIRE VAPORIZER
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    MZ/MuZ Riders Forum Index :: 660 cc All times are GMT - 5 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum




www.MZRiders.com © lostblur
Powered by phpBB 2.0.10 © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group
Charcoal2 Theme © Zarron Media
ezPortal © Smartor